Comparison
ProtoVid vs Loom for Figma design reviews
Loom is excellent for narrated, personal walkthroughs. But a Figma design review is usually about the screens, not your face — and reviewers need to point at a specific moment. ProtoVid is built for that: it renders the prototype cleanly and gives reviewers timestamped, frame-level comments without anyone recording anything.
| ProtoVid | Loom | |
|---|---|---|
| Built for Figma | ✓Reads your frames directly | General-purpose screen recorder |
| Frame-level comments | ✓Timestamped comments tied to the flow | Comments on the video timeline |
| Setup to share | ✓Export and send one link — no recording | Record a take, re-record if you fumble |
| Output consistency | ✓Deterministic render of the frames | Depends on the live take |
| Personal narration / your voice | –Not the focus | Camera + mic walkthrough is the core feature |
| Recording non-Figma content | –Figma frames only | Any app, any tab |
If the value is you explaining something in your own voice — onboarding, a sales walkthrough, a bug repro across apps — Loom is the better tool. ProtoVid wins specifically for Figma design reviews where the screens and precise feedback matter more than narration.
For Figma design reviews that need clean screens and pinpoint feedback, ProtoVid fits better. For narrated walkthroughs across any app, reach for Loom.
Try ProtoVid on your own flow
Install free, pick your frames, and export a clean walkthrough in minutes.
Install from Figma Community